MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397042988 · doi:10.1681/asn.20233411s1913b

Peritoneal Dialysis Patients Exhibit Quantifiable Neurocognitive Impairment but Not Acute Ischemic Brain Injury: A Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study

2023· article· en· W4397042988 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jessica Vanderlinden, Dickson Wong, Michael K. Chiu, Christopher W. McIntyre, Arsh K. Jain

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsLawson Health Research InstituteWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingDiffusion MRIMedicinePeritoneal dialysisNeurocognitiveNuclear magnetic resonanceRadiologyInternal medicinePsychiatryCognitionPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patients receiving hemodialysis (HD) are known to suffer recurrent ischemic multiorgan injury, which effects the vulnerable vascular beds of the brain. These acute cerebral insults are associated with significant white matter (WM) injury, ultimately leading to neurocognitive impairment. PD patients are not subject to the equivalent circulatory stress as HD patients suggesting PD is relatively neuro-protective. Our objective was to utilize an imaging-based approach previously applied to a HD cohort to examine the acute intradialytic effects of PD. Methods: Patients completed a neurocognitive battery (The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Trails Making Test (TMT), and Cambridge Brain Science (CBS)), an intradialytic MRI scan encompassing diffusion tensor imaging (DTI, WM integrity), and a proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS, neurochemistry). Imaging and neurocognitive assessments were performed before PD exchange, with repeat imaging after 90 minutes of dwell time. Results: 12 patients receiving PD were studied. Patient demographics included (mean±SD): 67±8 years of age, 75% male, 75% diabetic, dialysis vintage 18±10 months, ultrafiltration 0.58±0.36L, and PD exchange 8.3% with 2.5% and 91.7% with 4.25% dextrose. Neurocognitive impairment (%impaired) was evident by the TMTA/B measuring attention (A=92%) and executive function (B=42%). CBS tasks are classified by their contribution to verbal, short-term memory, and reasoning domains. The verbal weighted domain component score demonstrated the most impairment (46%). Finally, 2/12 patients (17%) exhibited global impairment detected by the MoCA. DTI imaging demonstrated no acute effects on WM integrity. However, 1H-MRS detected a 21% increase in brain glucose concentration (p=0.006). Conclusions: PD patients exhibited quantifiable neurocognitive deficits, but did not suffer acute intradialytic WM injury, supporting that PD may have neuro-protective benefits. PD dwell did result in brain hyperglycemia, indicative of acute metabolic stress. This may translate into an alternative hypothesis for progressive neurocognitive impairment via advanced glycation end-products, but further research is necessary. Funding: Private Foundation Support

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207