MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397044085 · doi:10.1681/asn.20233411s1118a

Comparative Effects of Cyclosporine and Voclosporin on Primary Human Proximal Tubular Epithelial Cell (PTEC) Gene Expression

2023· article· en· W4397044085 on OpenAlexaff
Theresa Aliwarga, Linda M. Rehaume, Catherine K. Yeung, Jonathan Himmelfarb, Edward J. Kelly

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsAurinia (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGene expressionGenePrimary (astronomy)BiologyMedicineCancer researchCell biologyPathologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The development of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) dramatically changed the face of transplantation, with the majority of solid organ transplant patients prescribed CNI-based therapeutics. Cyclosporine, a CNI that complexes with cyclophilin to competitively inhibit calcineurin phosphatase activity, has significant side effects with chronic nephrotoxicity the primary clinical concern. Cyclosporine related toxic effects include glomerulosclerosis, thrombotic microangiopathy and tubular vacuolization. Voclosporin, a recently approved CNI for treating adults with active lupus nephritis on a background of immunosuppression, is structurally similar to cyclosporine, with improved binding to calcineurin, higher potency and better tolerability. Methods: To compare the tubular effects of these two CNIs, we exposed cultures of primary human PTEC in either standard 2D tissue culture or when grown in a 3D kidney microphysiological system (MPS). Results: Exposure to increasing concentrations (0-10 μM) of cyclosporine or voclosporin [HJ1] revealed only minimal toxicity after 48 hr. in 2D culture. Similarly, exposure of MPS to 10 μM voclosporin or cyclosporine for 48 hr. did not significantly increase KIM-1, a urinary biomarker of acute kidney injury, in MPS effluents. To further differentiate these two CNIs, we performed bulk RNAseq analysis from the MPS studies and observed 443 differentially-expressed genes in the cyclosporine-treated MPS versus 45 genes in the voclosporin cohort. Biological process gene ontology analysis revealed 26 significant pathways in the cyclosporine group and none in the voclosporin group with the majority related to cell cycle processes. PTEC were labeled with a GFP-cytochrome C biosensor to monitor mitochondrial responses. Treatment with either CNI at 1 μM for 48 hr. revealed no changes whereas treatment with 10 μM of either CNI resulted in modest changes in mitochondria as measured by signal intensity and complexity of the network. Conclusions: Ongoing studies include longer term CNI exposures and effects of CYP3A5 genotype as this enzyme is polymorphic, expressed in the kidney and produces isozyme-specific metabolites of cyclosporine. Our results to date support differential effects of voclosporin versus cyclosporine on PTEC gene expression. Funding: Other NIH Support - NCATS, Commercial Support - Aurinia Pharmaceuticals

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207