MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397045564 · doi:10.1681/asn.20233411s171a

External Validation of the Klinrisk Model in US Commercial, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid Populations

2023· article· en· W4397045564 on OpenAlex
Navdeep Tangri, Thomas W. Ferguson, Ryan J. Bamforth, Chia‐Chen Teng, Joseph L. Smith, Maria Guzman, Ashley Goss

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDiverse Scientific Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicaidMedicineActuarial scienceBusinessEconomicsHealth careEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is typically undiagnosed till the majority of kidney function (eGFR) is lost. Accurate risk prediction tools for progressive CKD can enable early intervention for high risk individuals. The Klinrisk machine learning model accurately predicts progressive CKD using routinely collected laboratory data. We aimed to validate this model in US commercial, Medicare Advantage, and Medicaid populations. Methods: The Klinrisk random survival forest model predicts progressive CKD (40% decline in eGFR or kidney failure) using the values of age, sex, and 20 laboratory variables, including results from complete blood cell counts, chemistry panels, comprehensive metabolic panels, and urinalysis. We assessed model performance at 2- and 5- years post-index (first available serum creatinine result) in patients with/without urinalysis results (albumin-to-creatinine ratio, protein-to-creatinine-ratio, and semi-quantitative dipstick) in a large representative US population. Performance was assessed with discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), Brier scores, and calibration plots. Results: A total of 4,410,131 patients were evaluated with commercial insurance, 341,666 with Medicare Advantage, and 93,056 patients with Medicaid coverage. Discrimination was excellent across all forms of payor and with or without the results of urinalysis. In all cohorts, for prediction of the progression, AUCs ranged between 0.80 to 0.83 at 2 years, and 0.78-0.83 at 5 years. When urinalysis data were available, AUCs ranged between 0.81 to 0.87 at 2 years, and 0.80 to 0.87 at 5 years (Table). Brier scores were below 0.071 (0.068 to 0.075) for each combination of urinalysis availability and insurer type. Conclusions: A machine model trained on routine laboratory data can predict progression of CKD in a large representative US population of adults with or at risk for kidney disease. Implementation of the Klinrisk model can help identify patients who benefit from early intervention to delay CKD progression and reduce health care costs. Funding: Commercial Support - Boehringer Ingelheim AUC at 2- and 5- years (95% confidence interval) - Insurer All patients Commercial, n = 4,410,131 Medicare, n = 4,410,131 Medicaid, n = 93,056 UACR directly measured Commercial, n = 178,266 Medicare, n = 25,954 Medicaid, n = 9,353 Urine ACR or urine PCR Commercial, n = 193,992 Medicare, n = 28,120 Medicaid, n = 10,108 Urine ACR, urine PCR, or semi-quantitative dipstick result Commercial, n = 1,061,762 Medicare, n = 92,410 Medicare, n = 38,867 Commercial (2 years) Commercial (5 years) 0.83 (0.82 - 0.83)0.81 (0.81 - 0.81) 0.86 (0.85 - 0.87)0.84 (0.83 - 0.85) 0.86 (0.85 - 0.87)0.85 (0.84 - 0.85) 0.87 (0.86 - 0.97)0.85 (0.84 - 0.85) Medicare (2 years) Medicare (5 years) 0.80 (0.79 - 0.80)0.78 (0.78 - 0.79) 0.79 (0.77 - 0.80)0.78 (0.77 - 0.79) 0.79 (0.78 - 0.81)0.78 (0.77 - 0.80) 0.81 (0.80 - 0.82)0.80 (0.79 - 0.80) Medicare (2 years) Medicare (5 years) 0.83 (0.83 - 0.83)0.83 (0.83 - 0.83) 0.84 (0.81 - 0.87)0.87 (0.84 - 0.90) 0.84 (0.81 - 0.87)0.86 (0.83 - 0.90) 0.84 (0.83 - 0.86)0.87 (0.85 - 0.89)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it