MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4397045599 · doi:10.1681/asn.20233411s1646b

Practice Patterns of Nephrologists Who Care for Pregnant Patients with CKD

2023· article· en· W4397045599 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nada Alamri, Mohammad Almomen, Amber O. Molnar, Catherine M. Clase, Anna Mathew

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntensive care medicineNephrologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increases adverse pregnancy events such as pre-eclampsia, preterm delivery, and progression of maternal CKD. While live birth rates among pregnant people with kidney disease have increased, these pregnancies remain a high risk, emphasizing the critical need for advanced understanding and management strategies. Data on Canadian nephrologist practice patterns and center-specific strategies to improve outcomes for pregnant people with CKD are limited. This study used survey methodology to assess practice patterns and policies in this area. Methods: We conducted a national, cross-sectional survey to assess the practice patterns of Canadian nephrologists caring for pregnant people with CKD. Following literature review, we developed a list of items covering key aspects of CKD management in people who are pregnant, including pre-conception counseling, multispecialty team collaboration and post-transplant care. Items were refined and deduplicated through iterative review by team members. The survey was distributed through professional networks. The responses were analyzed descriptively and key findings were presented as percentages. Additionally, the results for each aspect of the questionnaire were evaluated in light of existing recommendations. Results: The survey response rate was 71% (25/35). Of the responding nephrologists, 76% identified as women, and 52% had been in practice between 10 and 19 years. Regarding multispecialty care, 36% reported having a full team, 40% had some team elements, and 24% had no team. Individualization of patient care was the most common practice, as opposed to a conventional or standardized approach. This preference for individualization extended to offering pre-natal genetic counselling, antenatal kidney biopsy and antibiotic prophylaxis, and post-partum ACE inhibitor re-initiation. Conclusions: Our study is the first to assess the practice patterns and policies of Canadian nephrologists caring for pregnant people with CKD. We found important variations in obstetric nephrology care, and that the majority of programs did not have a full multispecialty team. These results emphasize an opportunity to improve care through the creation of formal multidisciplinary teams and the consistent adoption of evidence-based policies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.610

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207