MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4397045673 · doi:10.1681/asn.20233411s1630b

The Practices and Views of US and Canadian Nephrologists, Nurses, and Allied Health Professionals Regarding Exercise and Physical Activity for People Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis

2023· article· en· W4397045673 on OpenAlexaffabout
Paul N. Bennett, Clara Bohm, Deborah Zimmerman, Jennifer M. MacRae, Oksana Harasemiw, Emilie Ford, Nancy Verdin, Iwona Gabrys, Krista Stewart, Stephanie E. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaOttawa HospitalUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeritoneal dialysisHealth professionalsMedicinePhysical activityNursingGerontologyPhysical therapyInternal medicineHealth carePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: In the US and Canada people receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD) are frequently sedentary and experience poor physical function. This creates clinical challenges because basic physical function is required to maintain independence for this home-based therapy. The aim of this study was to explore exercise-related practices and perceptions of nephrologists, PD nurses and allied health clinicians across the US and Canada. Methods: Secondary analysis of an international cross-sectional 13-item web-based survey of PD health professionals, exploring perspectives and practices regarding exercise for people receiving PD. Recruitment in the US and Canada was done through professional nephrology networks including the American Society of Nephrology, the Canadian Society of Nephrology, the American Nephrology Nurses' Association and the Canadian Association of Nephrology Nurses and Technicians. Results: 211 clinicians (88 nephrologists, 87 nurses and 36 allied health professionals) responded from the US (49%) and Canada (51%) with most (72%) reporting greater than 2 years PD experience. Most respondents (89%) believed PD patients could perform more exercise than they currently do. Most respondents (86%) agreed that structured exercise programs would be beneficial for people receiving PD. Eighty-six percent stated that PD patients would benefit from exercise professionals, however, only 27% of Canadian and 4% of US clinics had exercise professionals involved in programs. Sixty-one percent agreed and 34% were unsure whether people receiving PD could perform abdominal strengthening exercises safely. Seventy-three percent of PD programs had formal guidelines for swimming, 78% for lifting, 63% for falls, and 78% for physical activity resumption following PD catheter insertion. Conclusions: US and Canadian PD health professionals recognize the importance of exercise in people receiving PD and most programs have exercise-related policies. Even though there are few dedicated PD exercise programs in the US and Canada, most clinicians believed that exercise professionals and structured exercise programs would benefit people receiving PD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicDialysis and Renal Disease Management→French-language works237,207→