MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398140301 · doi:10.1002/jpr3.12081

Umbilical arterial catheter duration as risk factor for Bell's Stage III necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates

2024· article· en· W4398140301 on OpenAlexaff
Renjini Lalitha, Matthew Hicks, Mosarrat Qureshi, Kumar Kumaran

Bibliographic record

VenueJPGN Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicInfant Nutrition and Health
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNecrotizing enterocolitisMedicineGestational ageOdds ratioNeonatal intensive care unitBirth weightUnivariate analysisConfidence intervalRisk factorMultivariate analysisInternal medicineGastroenterologyPediatricsPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Objectives To explore risk factors for Stage‐III necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC‐III) in preterm neonates. Methods This was a retrospective case‐control study of neonates born <33 weeks gestational age (GA) who were admitted to a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit, between 2015 and 2018. NEC‐III cases were compared with Stage‐II NEC (NEC‐II) and non‐NEC controls. Two to four non‐NEC controls were matched by GA ± 1 week and date of birth ± 3 months, to one NEC‐III case. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine risk factors for NEC‐III. Results Of 1360 neonates born <33 weeks, 71 (5.2%) had NEC‐II and above, with 46% being NEC‐III. Mean age of onset of NEC‐III was 13.7 days versus 23.9 days for NEC‐II ( p = 0.01). Neonates with NEC‐III were of lower GA (NEC‐III 25.4 weeks, NEC‐II 27.3 weeks, and non‐NEC 26 weeks; p = 0.0008) and had higher Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology Perinatal Extension‐II scores (NEC‐III 47.5, NEC‐II 28.4 and non‐NEC 37, p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed duration of umbilical arterial catheter (UAC) >5 days was significantly associated with the development of NEC‐III with adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.8; 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.05–13.66) for NEC‐III versus non‐NEC and AOR 5.57; 95% CI (1.65–18.73), p = 0.006 for NEC‐III versus NEC‐II. Rupture of membranes (ROM) >1 week was associated with NEC‐III (AOR 6.93; 95% CI [1.56–30.69] vs. non‐NEC and AOR 11.74; 95% CI [1.14–120.34] vs. NEC‐II). Conclusion The increased association of NEC‐III with duration of UAC and ROM could be further examined in prospective studies, and an upper limit for UAC duration could be considered in NEC prevention bundles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.577
Threshold uncertainty score0.648

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJPGN ReportsSame topicInfant Nutrition and HealthFrench-language works237,207