MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398140769 · doi:10.1002/jmri.29452

Mediation of White Matter Alterations in the Association Between Ventricular Dilation and Cognitive Decline in Hydrocephalus Patients: An <scp>MRI</scp> Study

2024· article· en· W4398140769 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yawen Xiao, Yifei Gui, Jiankun Dai, Heng Zhao, Zhongliang Rao, Dan Luo, Xinru Deng, Xinlan Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNanchang University
KeywordsFractional anisotropyCardiologyInternal medicineWhite matterMedicineHydrocephalusMontreal Cognitive AssessmentDiffusion MRIFluid-attenuated inversion recoveryPsychologyCognitive declineMagnetic resonance imagingRadiologyDementiaDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Cognitive impairment is commonly observed in hydrocephalus patients. Ventricular enlargement compresses brain parenchyma, especially the white matter (WM). PURPOSE: To investigate whether the relationship between ventricular dilation and cognitive decline in hydrocephalus patients is mediated by WM alterations. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: 51 communicating hydrocephalus patients (median age, 54 years), 50 obstructive hydrocephalus patients (median age, 49 years), and 53 control subjects (median age, 50 years). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Diffusion tensors imaging, 3D T1 BRAVO, 3D FIESTA, CUBE T2, and FLAIR sequences at 3T. ASSESSMENT: DTI parameters (skeletonized fractional anisotropy (FA), skeletonized mean diffusivity (MD), and peak width of skeletonized mean diffusivity p(PSMD)) were extracted using FSL software. Global, periventricular, and deep white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volumes, degree of ventricular enlargement (Evans index), and other conventional imaging markers (number of lacunes and perivascular spaces, intracranial and brain volume) were extracted using united imaging intelligence. Cognitive tests included Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), clock drawing test (CDT), and vocabulary fluency test (VFT). STATISTICAL TESTS: Multivariable linear regression analysis, mediation analyses, and dominance analysis. P-value <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The degree of ventricular dilation, DTI parameters, and cognitive function scores were interrelated. The skeletonized FA values (β = -0.0917, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.205, -0.024) and normalized global WMH volume (β = -0.0635, 95% CI: -0.13, -0.0005) together mediated 37.2% of the association between Evans index and MoCA. A comparable causal pathway was found for periventricular WMHs but not for deep WMHs. Dominance analysis indicated skeletonized FA values had a greater impact on cognition than WMH volume. The skeletonized FA values also mediated the association between Evans index and CDT (β = -0.0897, 95% CI: -0.165, -0.026) and VFT (β = -0.1589, 95% CI: -0.27, -0.083). CONCLUSION: WM alterations were causal mediators between ventricular dilation and cognitive decline in hydrocephalus patients. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 3. TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 3.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207