Silo Bag Storage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Silo bags are a flexible, hermetic storage system made of polyethylene; they are available in a variety of sizes and can be used to store grains and their byproducts. Silo bags have gained extensive adoption as a hermetic storage solution in Argentina. Annually, this method is employed for the storage of roughly 50 million tonnes (Mt) of grain across various levels, including farms, grain elevators, industries, and even port facilities. Moreover, silo bags have gained recognition as a viable storage alternative in over 50 countries globally, ranging from cold climates like Canada and Russia to tropical regions such as Brazil and Colombia. In addition to the plastic bags themselves, the silo bag system involves other essential components, including bagging and extracting machines, as well as grain carts. These pieces of equipment have been specially designed with a high working capacity, enabling them to handle impressive volumes of 300–400 t per hour. Furthermore, silo bag monitoring systems have been developed based on CO 2 concentration measurements and airtightness evaluations through a pressure decay test. In general, when dry grain is stored in silo bags, the CO 2 levels range from 1% to 3%, while the O 2 levels range from 18% to 16%. As the moisture content (MC) and temperature of the grain increase, the modification of the interstitial atmosphere becomes more pronounced, resulting in CO 2 concentrations of up to 30% and O 2 levels of 5% to 0% for moist grain. Few instances of insect presence in silo bags have been reported, with data analysis indicating that unfavorable environmental conditions hinder insect development. Nevertheless, suitable pest control strategies, based on phosphine fumigation and controlled atmospheres, have been successfully implemented. The quality of grains stored in silo bags is influenced by the interaction between MC and temperature. When the MC is sufficiently low to inhibit microbiological activity, the temperature itself has minimal impact, allowing for storage even during the summer without deterioration in quality. When the MC is sufficiently high to permit microbial activity, the deterioration of quality parameters during winter is mitigated by the synergistic of low temperature and the modified atmosphere. However, in spring and summer heightened microbial activity and other detrimental processes intensify, resulting in a decline in quality parameters that cannot be compensated for by the modified atmosphere alone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.071 | 0.055 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".