MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398151458 · doi:10.1109/tpel.2024.3403496

Parallel Capacitive-Link Universal Converters With Low Current Stress and High Efficiency

2024· article· en· W4398151458 on OpenAlexaff
Junhao Luo, Khalegh Mozaffari, Brad Lehman, Mahshid Amirabadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsAlberta Energy
FundersAdvanced Research Projects Agency - EnergyU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsConvertersCapacitive sensingStress (linguistics)Current (fluid)Link (geometry)Electronic engineeringElectrical engineeringCapacitorMaterials scienceComputer scienceEngineeringVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Series capacitive-link universal converters are a relatively new class of single-stage power converters that offer numerous advantages including high reliability, high power density, and high efficiency. However, one of the limitations of these converters is high current stress of the switches, which lowers their efficiency especially in high current applications. In this article, a new class of soft-/hard-switched parallel capacitive-link converters is introduced to address this limitation of the series capacitive-link universal converter while keeping its advantages. Apart from providing bidirectional power transfer, the proposed ac–ac converter can implement voltage stepping up/down as well as frequency transformation. A small film capacitor, which is placed in parallel with the input and output switch bridges, is responsible for transferring the power from input towards output. A small inductor can be placed in series with the link capacitor to realize zero-current-switching for all the switches under any load conditions, which lowers the switching losses and reduces electromagnetic interference (EMI). The proposed parallel capacitive-link converter is expected to offer an enhanced efficiency and reduced current stress compared to the series capacitive-link universal converters. In this article, principles of the operation of the proposed converter are presented, and its performance and advantages are verified by simulation and experiment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207