MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

High altitude sojourn elicits divergent effects in aortic and carotid stiffness in healthy-young adults

2024· article· en· W4398165156 on OpenAlexaff
Spencer Romanowski, A Burkhart, Carolyn R. Steffen, Denise L. Smith, Tom D. Brutsaert, Trevor A. Day, Wesley K. Lefferts

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHigh Altitude and Hypoxia
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiologyAltitude (triangle)Internal medicineMedicineArterial stiffnessAortaEffects of high altitude on humansAnatomyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High altitude exposure challenges the cardiovascular system to compensate for barometric pressure-mediated reductions in arterial oxygen content. Reductions in oxygen content elicit simultaneous increases in sympathetic nervous system activity and vasodilation that may have competing effects on changes in large artery stiffness. The objective of this study was to examine changes in aortic and carotid stiffness during high altitude sojourn in healthy, young adults. We hypothesized that short-term high-altitude sojourn would increase both aortic and carotid stiffness. 17 Generally healthy adults (23±4 yrs, 25.0±3.0 BMI, n=9 females) underwent vascular assessments in the supine position at 1400 m and after an 8-day incremental ascent to 4300 m. Aortic stiffness and carotid β-stiffness were derived from carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) via applanation tonometry and right common carotid artery ultrasonography, with blood pressure assessed via oscillometry. Ascent from 1400 m to 4300 m resulted in decreased arterial oxygen saturation (-11±4 %, p<0.001) and carotid β-stiffness (-4.48±2.73 au, p<0.001), and increased cfPWV, (+54.98±78.10 cm/s, p=0.01) and mean arterial pressure (+4±7 mmHg, p=0.02). Changes in cfPWV, arterial oxygen saturation, and blood pressure were moderately to strongly correlated (r=-0.425-0.503, p=0.09-0.04). Our data suggest that short term exposure to high altitude has differential effects on carotid versus aortic stiffness despite increases in mean blood pressure. Increases in aortic stiffness appear related to hypoxia-induced reductions in arterial oxygen saturation and concomitant increases in blood pressure, while reductions in carotid stiffness may stem, in-part, from compensatory carotid artery dilation necessary to increase cerebral blood flow at high altitude. Additional research is necessary to further understand mechanisms underlying differential changes in large artery stiffness during high altitude sojourn. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicHigh Altitude and HypoxiaFrench-language works237,207