MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Arterial stiffness and wave reflection responses to acute and chronic high intensity interval training in healthy older adults

2024· article· en· W4398165400 on OpenAlexaff
Jin‐Su Kim, Stephanie Lapierre-Nguyen, Chatchamarn Soonhuae, Yasemin Sakarya, Éléonor Riesco, Katherine Robinson, Eileen Handberg

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArterial stiffnessHigh-intensity interval trainingIntensity (physics)CardiologyMedicinePulse wave velocityReflection (computer programming)Physical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicineInterval (graph theory)PsychologyPhysical therapyBlood pressurePhysicsMathematicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aging leads to large elastic artery stiffness which is associated with early return of wave reflection. These age-related alterations increase left ventricular afterload, predisposing older adults to cardiovascular disease. Endurance training is an effective strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease risk. We have developed a supervised home-based exercise intervention using high intensity interval training on an all-extremity non-weight-bearing ergometer (HIIT-ANE). This study aimed to test the following hypotheses in healthy older adults: 1) arterial stiffness and wave reflection would decrease in response to chronic HIIT-ANE, 2) arterial stiffness and wave reflection responses to acute HIIT-ANE would differ in the untrained compared to the trained states, and 3) arterial stiffness and aortic wave reflection responses to acute and chronic HIIT-ANE would be related. Twenty older adults (66±1 years, mean ± SE; 11 postmenopausal women and 9 men) participated in this study. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and augmentation index at heart rate 75 bpm (AIx@75)—indices of arterial stiffness and wave reflection, respectively—were assessed by SphygmoCor XCEL at baseline (T0), following 8 weeks of normal lifestyle (T1; control condition), and following 8 weeks of supervised home-based HIIT-ANE (T2). Acute cfPWV and AIx@75 responses to HIIT-ANE were assessed at pre-, end-of-, 1-hr post- and 24-hrs post-exercise, in the untrained and trained states. cfPWV increased after 8 weeks of normal lifestyle (T0 vs. T1: 7.9±0.3 vs. 8.2±0.3 m/s, P=0.03), but it decreased following 8 weeks of HIIT-ANE (T1 vs. T2: 8.2±0.3 vs. 7.7±0.3 m/s, P<0.001). AIx@75 decreased after 8 weeks of HIIT-ANE compared to baseline and following 8 weeks of normal lifestyle (T0 vs. T2: 23.7±1.8 vs. 17.8±1.9 %, P<0.001; T1 vs. T2: 24.9±2.2 vs. 17.8±1.9 %, P<0.001). Acute cfPWV and AIx@75 responses to HIIT-ANE were similar in the untrained and trained states ( P for condition×time interaction; cfPWV: P=0.8; AIx@75: P=0.9). cfPWV and AIx@75 responses to chronic HIIT-ANE were not significantly related with acute responses to HIIT-ANE in the untrained (cfPWV: r=0.07, P=0.8; AIx@75: r=-0.32, P=0.2) and trained states (cfPWV: r=0.10, P=0.7; AIx@75: r=-0.32, P=0.2). In conclusion, we have demonstrated that supervised home-based HIIT-ANE has beneficial vascular effects in healthy older adults. We also showed that acute vascular responses to HIIT-ANE do not change from the untrained to trained state and are not predictive of chronic vascular responses to HIIT-ANE. This work was supported by the National Institute of Aging grant AG063143. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiology→Same topicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention→French-language works237,207→