MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Proteomic Changes during Human Heat Stress and Heat Acclimation

2024· article· en· W4398165421 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hadiatou Barry, Daniel Gagnon, Amina Barhdadi, Essaïd Oussaïd, Ian Mongrain, Louis‐Philippe Lemieux Perreault, Marie‐Pierre Dubé

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat stressAcclimatizationHeat shock proteinCell biologyChemistryBiologyBiochemistryEcologyAnimal science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION. To thrive in a warmer climate, humans will need to adapt physiologically. Improved thermoregulatory and cardiovascular responses during heat acclimation have been widely described. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms mediating these improvements remain understudied in humans. The aim of this study was to perform a broad-spectrum, non-targeted proteomic analysis to determine how plasma protein levels change in response to moderate heat stress and heat acclimation. METHODS. Ten healthy adults (4F/6H, age: 25 ± 3 years) attended two laboratory visits performed before and after a 7-day heat acclimation protocol (hot water immersion, 60 min at a rectal temperature ≥38.5°C). During the visits, blood samples were drawn before and during passive heat stress (~1.5°C increase in esophageal temperature, water-perfused suit). Proteomic analyses were performed on 2938 plasma proteins using the Olink Explore 3072 assay. We quantified the number of proteins that changed by more than one log 2 (fold change) in concentration. RESULTS. Prior to acclimation, ~1% of the proteins (n=29) changed in concentration during heat stress. The change in concentration for 9 of these proteins reached the p value threshold. After acclimation, 54 proteins changed in concentration under a normothermic state. During subsequent heat stress, 175 proteins (~6%) increased in concentration and 19 (~0.6%) decreased. For 180 of these proteins, the change in concentration during heat stress was unique to the post-acclimation visit. The genes for proteins that changed in concentration during heat stress prior to acclimation are more highly expressed in brain (FGFBP3), arterial (TIMP4), skin (OBP2B), lung/salivary gland/esophageal (CXCL17) tissue. The genes for proteins that changed concentration in response to heat acclimation are highly expressed in skin (MMP7, CA6, KLK14) and brain tissue (DNER). The genes for proteins that only changed in concentration during heat stress post-acclimation are more highly expressed in brain (MOG, SMOC1, PTPRN2), and arterial (TNC, C1QTNF1, MATN2, NTF3, SMOC1) tissue. CONCLUSION. This untargeted and large-scale proteomic analysis identified novel plasma proteins that change in concentration during human heat stress and subsequent heat acclimation. The individual protein results can be utilized as external validation for other studies, as the basis of further data analysis explorations, and/or to guide targeted investigations of the biological responses and adaptations to heat exposure. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207