MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Estrogen, Exercise Training, and Nitric-oxide Mediated Sympatholysis

2024· article· en· W4398165846 on OpenAlexaffabout
Darren S. DeLorey, Breanne S. Collison, Timothy P. Just

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitric oxideEstrogenTraining (meteorology)EndocrinologyMedicineChemistryInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our laboratory has previously reported that nitric oxide (NO)-mediated inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstriction in contracting muscle (sympatholysis) was enhanced in female, compared with male rats. Estrogen has been shown to modulate NO synthase (NOS) expression and NO-mediated sympatholysis. Therefore, this study investigated the hypothesis that NO-mediated inhibition of sympathetic vasoconstriction in resting and contracting skeletal muscle of female rats would be a function of estrogen bioavailability. Further, exercise training has been shown to enhance sympatholysis. Thus, we also investigated the hypothesis that exercise training would restore sympatholysis in estrogen-deficient rats. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized to sedentary ovary-intact (SOI, n=10), sedentary ovariectomized (SOVX, n=9), exercise-trained (10 weeks, 5 days/week, 600m, 40m·min −1 , 5% grade) ovary-intact (TOI, n=13), or exercise-trained ovariectomized (TOVX, n=10) groups. OVX rats had both ovaries surgically removed. Following sedentary behavior or exercise training, rats were anesthetized and instrumented for measurement of blood pressure, femoral vascular conductance (FVC), stimulation of the lumbar sympathetic chain, and contraction of the triceps surae muscle group. The percentage change of FVC (%FVC) in response to sympathetic chain stimulation delivered at 2 and 5 Hz was determined at rest and during muscle contraction (60% maximal contractile force) in control, selective neuronal NOS (nNOS) inhibition (SMTC; 0.6 mg·kg −1 IV), and non-selective NOS inhibition (L-NAME; 10 mg·kg −1 IV) conditions. In the Control condition, sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness (%FVC) in resting and contracting skeletal muscle was not different between groups. Under resting conditions, sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness was not different following selective nNOS inhibition (p>0.05), but was increased (p<0.05, main effect of drug) following non-selective NOS inhibition compared with control and selective nNOS inhibition conditions at both 2 Hz and 5 Hz. During muscle contraction, sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness to 2 Hz sympathetic stimulation was unchanged (p>0.05) in the presence of selective nNOS inhibition, but was increased (p<0.05, main effect of drug) following non-selective NOS inhibition compared with control and selective nNOS inhibition conditions. At 5 Hz, sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness was increased (p<0.05, main effect of drug) by selective nNOS inhibition, and increased further (p<0.05, main effect of drug) by non-selective NOS inhibition. The magnitude of sympatholysis at 2 Hz was not different (p>0.05) between groups or drug conditions. At 5 Hz, sympatholysis was blunted (p<0.05, main effect of drug) in the selective nNOS inhibition condition, and further reduced (p<0.05, main effect of drug condition) following non-selective NOS inhibition in all groups. Sympatholysis was not different (p>0.05) between sedentary and exercise trained groups. In conclusion: 1) sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness in resting and contracting skeletal muscle was not dependent on estrogen bioavailability; 2) NO blunted vasoconstriction in all groups, however, NO-mediated sympatholysis was not altered by estrogen status, and; 3) exercise training did not alter sympathetic vasoconstrictor responsiveness or sympatholysis regardless of estrogen bioavailability. NSERC, Canada, Canadian Foundation for Innovation. This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207