MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

TECENDO REFLEXÕES: SOBRE A OBRA A MULHER QUE MATOU OS PEIXES DE CLARICE LISPECTOR

2024· article· pt· W4398166240 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Foco · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature, Culture, and Criticism
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo propõe uma análise crítica da obra A mulher que matou os peixes (1968), de Clarice Lispector, adentrando o universo da literatura infantil. Abordaremos aspectos empregados na narrativa como o diálogo com o leitor, o uso da oralidade, o emprego de ilustrações e a presença da temática da morte. Para embasar nossa análise, utilizaremos como referencial teórico os escritos de Coelho (2000), Zilberman (2015) e Lajolo (1988) sobre literatura infantil, além das reflexões de Zinani (2010), Moisés (1970) e Serra (1998) acerca das características presentes na obra de Clarice Lispector. A escolha por explorar o livro em questão foi motivada pela maneira como a autora aborda os dilemas da vida, tornando-os acessíveis e compreensíveis para os leitores infantis. Suas histórias cotidianas permitem que os jovens leitores se identifiquem e compreendam melhor suas próprias experiências.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0070.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it