Cerebrovascular Compliance during Progressive Hypotension in Patients with Autonomic Failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Cerebral perfusion during reductions in arterial pressure (AP) can be supported transiently by a Windkessel mechanism that increases cerebrovascular compliance (Ci). This defense mechanism exists in healthy participants during rapid standing and in patients during vasovagal syncope. However, it remains unknown whether the rise in Ci with falling AP exhibits a threshold effect. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that increased Ci is passive to a reduction in AP and starts to increase only after a threshold has been reached. To test this hypothesis, it was necessary to study a population that tolerates progressive large reductions in BP without a loss of consciousness. Therefore, we analyzed Ci changes during a graded head-up tilt (HUT) from patients with autonomic failure (AF). Methods: Finger AP and right middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv) were recorded from 5 AF patients (n = 5 male, 61 ± 23 years, 25 ± 5 kg/m2) at supine rest and during graded-HUT (30, 45, 60 degrees). Tilt gradients increased incrementally every 5 minutes until AP reached a critically low value prompting termination of HUT. The total time in HUT was 11 ± 4 min. Individual AP and MCAv waveforms during supine rest and graded HUT (one waveform every 5 s) were assessed with a modified Windkessel model to calculate Ci and cerebrovascular resistance (CVR). Pulse pressure (PP) was calculated as systolic AP − diastolic AP. A threshold value for the increase in Ci was determined as five consecutive cardiac cycles greater than the average supine Ci plus 2 standard deviations. Results: Graded HUT resulted in an overall reduction in AP (85 ± 18 to 50 ± 7 mmHg), PP (72 ± 22 to 32 ± 19 mmHg), mean MCAv (62 ± 12 to 35 ± 7 cm/s), and CVR (1.4 ± 0.1 to 1.0 ± 0.3 mmHg/cm/s; all p < 0.05 vs supine). Ci increased by 905 ± 756% (p = 0.04 vs supine). The threshold effect was evident as Ci began to increase progressively after PP fell by 15 ± 3 mmHg and AP fell by 12 ± 2 mmHg. Conclusions: Our results provide evidence that Ci increases after a threshold reduction in PP and AP in the apparent absence of autonomic support. These data support the idea that increasing Ci during reductions in AP represents a pressure-dependent Windkessel mechanism. Of interest, our findings provide clinical insight into how AF patients compensate for such large reductions in pressure without the assistance of CVR as a defense mechanism. NSERC USRA — Western University, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC, Grant No. RGPIN-2018-06255). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".