MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398169558 · doi:10.3390/rs16111827

GeoSparseNet: A Multi-Source Geometry-Aware CNN for Urban Scene Analysis

2024· article· en· W4398169558 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Kamran Afzal, Weiquan Liu, Yu Zang, Shuting Chen, H. M. Rehan Afzal, Jibril Muhammad Adam, Yang Bai, Jonathan Li, Cheng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The convolutional neural networks (CNNs) functioning on geometric learning for the urban large-scale 3D meshes are indispensable because of their substantial, complex, and deformed shape constitutions. To address this issue, we proposed a novel Geometry-Aware Multi-Source Sparse-Attention CNN (GeoSparseNet) for the urban large-scale triangular mesh classification task. GeoSparseNet leverages the non-uniformity of 3D meshes to depict both broad flat areas and finely detailed features by adopting the multi-scale convolutional kernels. By operating on the mesh edges to prepare for subsequent convolutions, our method exploits the inherent geodesic connections by utilizing the Large Kernel Attention (LKA) based Pooling and Unpooling layers to maintain the shape topology for accurate classification predictions. Learning which edges in a mesh face to collapse, GeoSparseNet establishes a task-oriented process where the network highlights and enhances crucial features while eliminating unnecessary ones. Compared to previous methods, our innovative approach outperforms them significantly by directly processing extensive 3D mesh data, resulting in more discerning feature maps. We achieved an accuracy rate of 87.5% when testing on an urban large-scale model dataset of the Australian city of Adelaide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207