Restoration of the Gothic Tombstone of Arnošt of Pardubice in Kłodzko (Poland). Research results summary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fakulta restaurovĂĄnĂ UPa provedla v letech 2015-17 komplexnĂ prĹŻzkum a restaurovĂĄnĂ nĂĄhrobku ArnoĹĄta z Pardubic, kterĂ˝ se nachĂĄzĂ ve farnĂm kostele NanebevzetĂ NejsvÄtÄjĹĄĂ Panny Marie v polskĂŠm Kladsku. NĂĄhrobek pĹedstavuje mimoĹĂĄdnĂ˝ doklad gotickĂŠho sochaĹskĂŠho umÄnĂ 14. stoletĂ. DĂlo bylo v minulosti nÄkolikrĂĄt poĹĄkozeno a dochovalo se v torzĂĄlnĂ podobÄ, a to ve znaÄnÄ neutÄĹĄenĂŠm stavu. OpukovĂ˝ nĂĄhrobek osazenĂ˝ na tumbÄ z ÄervenĂŠho vĂĄpence nebyl nikdy restaurovĂĄn specialistou na restaurovĂĄnĂ kamene, byl pouze neodbornÄ a nepĹĂliĹĄ zdaĹile opraven a ani na nÄm nebyl proveden materiĂĄlovĂ˝ vĂ˝zkum. ProvedenĂ˝ komplexnĂ prĹŻzkum a restaurovĂĄnĂ pĹineslo celou Ĺadu poznatkĹŻ, kterĂŠ mohou napomoci k poznĂĄnĂ historie nĂĄhrobku. ZĂĄsadnĂ zjiĹĄtÄnĂ pĹinesla petrologickĂĄ analĂ˝za, kterĂĄ se ukĂĄzala jako velmi dobrĂĄ podpĹŻrnĂĄ metoda pro urÄenĂ provenience pouĹžitĂŠ horniny. Hornina pouĹžitĂĄ pro figurĂĄlnĂ ÄĂĄst nĂĄhrobku byla jednoznaÄnÄ urÄena jako sedimentĂĄrnĂ hornina, pochĂĄzejĂcĂ z praĹžskĂŠ oblasti ÄeskĂŠ kĹĂdovĂŠ pĂĄnve. VĂ˝sledky prokĂĄzaly, Ĺže pro zhotovenĂ nĂĄhrobku byla pouĹžita bÄlohorskĂĄ opuka z vrstvy tradiÄnÄ oznaÄovanĂŠ jako "zlatĂĄ opuka". TakĂŠ v pĹĂpadÄ vĂĄpencovĂŠ tumby, o jejĂĹž pĹŻvodnosti se vedou spory, petrologickĂĄ analĂ˝za urÄila jako mĂsto pĹŻvodu okolĂ Prahy a lomy, kterĂŠ byly vyuĹžĂvĂĄny jiĹž ve 14. stoletĂ. Z porovnĂĄnĂ poĹĄkozenĂ zaznamenanĂŠho na grafikĂĄch ze 17. stoletĂ a souÄasnĂŠho stavu je zĹejmĂŠ, Ĺže se jednĂĄ o stejnĂ˝ blok. Podle tÄchto informacĂ usuzujeme, Ĺže tumba je pĹŻvodnĂ. Projevy poĹĄkozenĂ opuky prokazatelnĂŠ makroskopicky a takĂŠ mikroskopicky potvrzujĂ dochovanĂŠ zprĂĄvy o poŞåru kostela. Z hlediska poznĂĄnĂ nÄkdejĹĄĂho vzhledu nĂĄhrobku je dĹŻleĹžitĂĄ i informace, Ĺže nĂĄhrobek nebyl s nejvÄtĹĄĂ pravdÄpodobnostĂ barevnÄ upravovĂĄn a vyuĹžĂval kombinace pĹirozenĂŠ barevnosti ÄervenĂŠho leĹĄtitelnĂŠho vĂĄpence a svÄtlĂŠ opuky. Je moĹžnĂŠ, Ĺže povrchy obou materiĂĄlĹŻ byly pĹŻvodnÄ nebo pozdÄji povrchovÄ upraveny transparentnĂ penetracĂ resp. velmi tenkĂ˝m nĂĄtÄrem na bĂĄzi pĹĂrodnĂch pojiv, ÄĂmĹž se prohloubila barevnost a zvýťil lesk podkladovĂŠ horniny. ZajĂmavĂŠ poznatky pĹineslo i vlastnĂ restaurovĂĄnĂ, kdy se podaĹilo urÄit a nĂĄslednÄ obnovit pĹŻvodnĂ rozmÄr tumby a navrĂĄtit jĂ jejĂ monumentĂĄlnĂ podobu, byĹĽ dochovanou ve fragmentĂĄrnĂm stavu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".