MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398173445 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2024.110547

Draft genome sequence data on Bacillus safensis U41 isolated from soils of Santiniketan, India

2024· article· en· W4398173445 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Binoy Kumar Show, Andrew B. Ross, Raju Biswas, Shibani Chaudhury, Srinivasan Balachandran

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilUniversity of Leeds
KeywordsWhole genome sequencingBiologyGenomeSequence (biology)Research articleGeneticsGeneLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The draft genome sequence of an isolate of Bacillus safensis U41 from the soils of Santiniketan (23040’12” N and 87039’52” E) is reported here. Bacillus safensis is a bacterium that produces cellulases which is essential for the breakdown of plant biomass. As such, it is a valuable source of digestive enzymes from plant biomass, especially cellulases. The genomic DNA was extracted from a single colony using a QIAgen Blood and Tissue kit (QIAgen Inc., Canada). Sequencing was performed via Illumina HiSeq X using 2 × 150 paired-end chemistry, generating 7,352,576 reads with sequence coverage of 509x. The assembly produced 20 contigs over 200 base pairs (bp) in length, with an N50 value of 901304 and an L50 of 2. The genome size was 3,732,407 bp, and the average GC content was 41.43 %. Genome annotation and gene predictions were performed using Prokka v.1.14.6, which identified 3783 coding sequences, 64 tRNA genes, and 3 rRNA genes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207