MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398174705 · doi:10.3389/frbee.2024.1355401

Varroa destructor economic injury levels and pathogens associated with colony losses in Western Canada

2024· article· en· W4398174705 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nuria Morfín, Leonard J. Foster, Ernesto Guzmán‐Novoa, Paul Van Westendorp, R. William Currie, Heather Higo

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Bee Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect and Pesticide Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaMinistry of AgricultureUniversity of GuelphCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentreUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVarroa destructorVarroaBiologyHoney BeesEnvironmental healthEcologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The honey bee parasitic mite, Varroa destructor , is considered the main factor associated with winter colony losses. To control this mite, beekeepers must implement Integrated Pest Management (IPM) strategies. An effective IPM strategy is based on timely monitoring of mite levels to treat the colonies when the mites reach an economic threshold and before they grow to damaging levels (economic injury level). Additionally, concerns have been raised about the possible interaction between V. destructor and other stressors; stressors acting additively or synergistically may lead to high colony mortality. Methodology Varroa destructor levels were recorded in colonies from five regions of British Columbia, Canada: Lower Mainland, Kootenay, Okanagan, Cariboo, and Peace. Mite levels were analyzed for associations with colony strength and mortality, as well as with other pathogens that were identified using total RNA sequencing. Results The Kootenay and Lower Mainland regions had the highest V. destructor levels in the fall (3.38±0.65 and 2.51±0.57, respectively) followed by the Okanagan (1.54±0.36), Cariboo (1.31±0.39), and Peace (0.66±0.25) regions. The Peace region had a significantly lower proportion of dead colonies than the other regions. Varroa destructor levels in the fall significantly predicted odds of colony mortality in the spring. Colonies with ≥ 1% mite infestation in the fall (August) had a significantly higher mortality rate (p=0.005) compared to colonies with <1% mite levels. Therefore, treatment is recommended above that threshold. Also, deformed wing virus-B levels were 8.4 times higher than those of deformed wing virus-A variant in all the regions and were highest in the Kootenay region, which also had the highest rate of colony losses. Lastly, Malpighamoeba mellificae and Nosema (Vairimorpha) apis transcripts were identified along with other pathogens that deserve further investigation, including Apis mellifera filamentous virus, Apis rhabdovirus, Lake Sinai virus, Varroa tymo-like, and Apis mellifera solinvivirus 1. Discussion The dynamic nature of host-pathogen interactions requires frequent pathogen surveillance to determine the prevalence and levels of parasitic mites and associated infectious diseases, and their impact on honey bee health, not only in the regions of this study, but globally. Nevertheless, more studies are needed to determine the nature of the type of interaction between the identified pathogens and V. destructor . Also, more research is needed to evaluate their potential impact on colony survival, to provide accurate mite and disease control recommendations to beekeepers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Bee ScienceSame topicInsect and Pesticide ResearchFrench-language works237,207