MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cold-water foot immersion and physiological strain of adults with coronary artery disease during hot and humid heat exposure

2024· article· en· W4398175403 on OpenAlexaff
Adèle Mornas, Léa Bettremieux, Josep Iglésies, Craig G. Crandall, M Fiatarone-Singh

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfrared Thermography in Medicine
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronary artery diseaseStrain (injury)MedicineCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Heat extremes are associated with a greater risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes, especially among adults with coronary artery disease. While air-conditioning provides exceptional protection during heat extremes, it is neither sustainable nor widely accessible. Cold-water foot immersion reduces physiological heat strain in healthy young adults but its effect in more vulnerable populations remains unknown. Objective and hypotheses: This study aims to identify the effect of cold-water foot immersion on markers of physiological heat strain in adults with coronary artery disease. We hypothesized that cold-water foot immersion would reduce physiological heat strain when used on its own and that this effect would be greater when combined with an electric fan. Methods: 17 adults living with stable coronary artery disease (2 females/15 males; 67±8 years) were exposed to a 38°C, 60% relative humidity environment for 3 hours on three separate, randomized occasions: i) no cooling (control; CON); ii) cold-water foot immersion (20 min of immersion each 30 min, ~30 cm in water kept at ~18°C; FI); iii) cold-water foot immersion and fan use (FI+FAN). Rectal and skin temperatures, heart rate (5-lead ECG), and whole-body sweat loss (change in nude weight) were measured. Results: The increase in rectal temperature did not differ between conditions (CON: 0.40±0.24°C, FI: 0.41±0.29°C, and FI+FAN: 0.36±0.22°C; p≥0.49). The increase in skin temperature was reduced with FI and FI+FAN compared to CON (CON: 4.9±0.8°C, FI: 4.1±1.2°C, and FI+FAN: 4.3±0.8°C; p≤0.01), with no difference between FI and FI+FAN (p=0.15). Similarly, the increase in heart rate was reduced with FI and FI+FAN compared to CON (CON: 8±6 bpm, FI: 4±6 bpm, and FI+FAN: 3±6 bpm; p≤0.01), with no difference between FI and FI+FAN (p=0.45). Sweat loss was also reduced by FI and FI+FAN compared with CON (CON: 823±114 g, FI: 544±174 g, and FI+FAN: 671±255 g; p≤0.03), with sweat loss during FI sweat loss being lower than during FI+FAN (p=0.03). Conclusion: The results show that cold-water foot immersion, used alone or in combination with an electric fan, reduces the increase in heart rate and whole-body sweat loss of adults living with coronary artery disease exposed to a hot and humid environment for 3 hours. This could be linked to the lower increase in skin temperature with foot immersion. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (APP1147789). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicInfrared Thermography in MedicineFrench-language works237,207