MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of Peripheral Versus Central Insulin on Cerebrovascular Compliance in Healthy Young Adults

2024· article· en· W4398175535 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Shariff, Leena N. Shoemaker, AUBREY M. PIPKINS, Neil J. McMillan, Dain W. Jacob, Anna M. Gonsalves, Jennifer L. Harper

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeripheralCompliance (psychology)MedicineInsulinInternal medicineCardiologyEndocrinologyPhysiologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: Vascular compliance is an essential component of cerebral blood flow regulation. Prior work has shown cerebral vasodilation (elicited by hypercapnia) reduces cerebrovascular compliance (Ci); however, this work has yet to be translated to other vasoactive compounds. Insulin has important vasodilatory effects in the peripheral circulation, but less is known about the role of insulin in cerebrovascular control. Herein, we hypothesized both peripheral (intravenous) and central (intranasal) insulin administration would increase indices of cerebral blood flow and reduce Ci in healthy young adults. Methods: Twenty-five healthy young adults (8 female; 26±7 yrs, 25±3 kg/m 2 ) were assigned to two separate protocols (NCT05244694, NCT05153395). Middle cerebral artery blood velocity (MCAv, transcranial Doppler ultrasound) was measured at baseline and under two study conditions: 1) at the end of a 60 min hyperinsulinemic euglycemic infusion, and 2) 60 min following 160 IU of intranasal insulin. Indices of Ci were calculated using a modified Windkessel model applied to blood pressure (finger photoplethysmography) and corresponding MCAv waveforms collected over a 5-min period (10 waveforms) at baseline and during the aforementioned insulin conditions. Results: Blood glucose remained unchanged throughout both protocols (both p>0.05). MCAv was maintained over time under both insulin conditions (protocol 1: 60±13 to 62±17 cm/s, p=0.635; protocol 2: 58±9 to 53±14 cm/s, p=0.146). In contrast, Ci decreased (0.00028±0.00010 to 0.00021±0.00007 cm/s/mmHg, p=0.010) from baseline during peripheral (intravenous) insulin administration. No change in Ci (0.00049±0.00025 to 0.00040±0.00018 cm/s/mmHg, p=0.189) were observed following intranasal insulin administration. Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no effect of peripheral or central insulin administration on resting MCAv in healthy young adults. However, intravenous (but not intranasal) insulin reduced Ci by approximately 25% from baseline values. These findings advance our understanding of cerebrovascular control mechanisms during insulin exposure and provide the opportunity to extend this work to diseased states characterized by insulin resistance, including diabetes. CAFNR Joy of Discovery (JKL, JP). This is the full abstract presented at the American Physiology Summit 2024 meeting and is only available in HTML format. There are no additional versions or additional content available for this abstract. Physiology was not involved in the peer review process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiologySame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207