On the fate of protonated chloroformates in the gas phase: a competition between forming HCl and chloroformic acid
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Chloroformates are prevalent in the atmosphere due to their utilization as fuel additives and industrial solvents. These species may undergo interactions with atmospheric water resulting in protonated chloroformates. This study delves into the gas‐phase dissociation of these protonated species. Tandem mass spectrometry was employed to scrutinize the unimolecular dissociation of protonated methyl ( 1 ), ethyl ( 2 ), neopentyl ( 3 ), and phenyl chloroformate ( 4 ). Notably, 1 and 4 exhibited HCl loss, yielding CH 3 OCO + and C 6 H 5 OCO + , respectively, with 1 additionally generating neutral methanol and ClCO + . 4 additionally loses CO and CO 2 . In contrast, 2 and 3 each only exhibit a single fragmentation channel, with 2 losing C 2 H 4 to generate protonated chloroformic acid and 3 generating protonated 2‐methylbutene by losing neutral chloroformic acid. Density functional theory at the B3LYP/6‐311+G(d,p) level of theory was employed to explore minimum energy reaction pathways for each ion, and CBS‐QB3 single‐point energy calculations were added to provide reliable energetics. The Rice–Ramsperger–Kassel–Marcus (RRKM) calculations of the rate constants for selected competing processes were carried out to link theory and experiment. One common unimolecular process observed was the 1,3‐H shift of the proton from the carbonyl oxygen to the ester oxygen before dissociation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".