MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398194423 · doi:10.1525/luminos.204

A Burdensome Experiment: Race, Labor, and Schools in New Orleans after Katrina

2024· book· en· W4398194423 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Christien Philmarc Tompkins

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Discipline and Inequality
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUniversity of OxfordUniversity of CambridgeTulane UniversityYork UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaPrinceton UniversityBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsRace (biology)Hurricane katrinaPolitical scienceHistoryCriminologySociologyGeographyNatural disasterGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, the New Orleans public school board fired nearly 7,500 teachers and employees. In the decade that followed, the city created the first urban public school system in the United States to be entirely contracted out to private management. Veteran educators, collectively referred to as the “backbone” of the city’s Black middle class, were replaced by younger, less experienced, white teachers who lacked historical ties to the city. In A Burdensome Experiment, Christien Philmarc Tompkins argues that the privatization of New Orleans schools has made educators into a new kind of racialized worker. As school districts across the nation backslide on school integration, Tompkins asks, who exactly deserves to teach our children? The struggle over this question exposes the inherent antiblackness of charter school systems and the unequal burdens of school choice. “Anyone committed to creating liberatory models of education must read this book, not because it has all the answers but because it asks the right questions, with care and humility. And isn’t that what great teachers do?” — ROBIN D. G. KELLEY, Distinguished Professor and Gary B. Nash Endowed Chair in US History, University of California, Los Angeles “Christien Philmarc Tompkins’s trenchant labor ethnography goes beyond ‘what works’ in urban schools to attend to a city still reeling from the institutional violence of post-Katrina school reform.” — SAVANNAH SHANGE, author of Progressive Dystopia: Abolition, Antiblackness, and Schooling in San Francisco “Theoretically precise and powerfully personal, this ethnographic analysis is spot-on and a uniquely important contribution to real-world understandings of the ways that the universalized, normative whiteness so prominent in design worlds continues to damage and destroy while claiming to solve problems.” — ELIZABETH CHIN, Editor in Chief, American Anthropologist CHRISTIEN PHILMARC TOMPKINS is Assistant Professor of Anthropology at Rutgers University, New Brunswick.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducation Discipline and InequalityFrench-language works237,207