Investigation of the effect of task-oriented occupational therapy on daily living activity performance in chronic stroke patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: Task-oriented therapy (TOT) is used to increase the effectiveness of upper extremity (UE) in activity daily living (ADL). This study aimed to investigate the effect of TOT on the participation and ADLs of stroke patients. Methods: Between October 2018 and February 2019, 28 chronic stroke patients were included in the study treated in Kocaeli University Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Turkey. The performance areas and participation status of the patients in which they experienced limitations were evaluated with the Canadian Occupational Performance Scale (COPM), and their level of independence in ADLs was evaluated with the Modified Frenchay Activity Index (mFAI) and Barthel Index (BI). All patients were included in the occupational therapy (OT) program five days a week for three weeks at Kocaeli University Hospital. Three ADLs in which they had difficulties were studied with 28 patients. Each of the activities was designed specifically for the patient. All assessments were repeated after three weeks of treatment. Results: A total of 28 patients, 12 females and 16 males, diagnosed with stroke, were included in the study. A statistically significant increase was found in the COPM performance and satisfaction value compared to the pre-treatment value (p<0.001). A statistically significant difference was found between pre- and post-treatment mFAI and BI values (p<0.001). Conclusions: Adding task-oriented therapy to the rehabilitation programs of stroke patients will contribute to the improvement of ADL. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.6.7954 How to cite this: Cekmece C, Sade I, Ozcan E, Balci S. Investigation of the effect of task-oriented occupational therapy on daily living activity performance in chronic stroke patients. Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(6):1214-1218. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.6.7954 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".