MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398199836 · doi:10.52783/jes.3632

Standard Essential Patents Data Study of the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Intelligent Connected Vehicle Technological Advancement

2024· article· en· W4398199836 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Electrical Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicIntellectual Property and Patents
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research employs a machine learning-based text mining algorithm and the international patent classification (IPC) co-occurrence network approach, utilizing patent documents submitted from 2015 to 2022 to empirically examine the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on modern electric car progress. The research illustrates the dynamically shifting structure of the fusion of AI and electric car technology and indicates how AI has impacted electric car technological advancement through time. It is based on classified artificial intelligence techniques. This research shows that artificial intelligence speeds up the automated process of driving in electric cars, that the AI technique often employed in electric vehicles has undergone modifications long period, and that the technical aspects of electric cars that AI impacts have shifted as well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it