MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398200536 · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae182

Cardiac rehabilitation registries around the globe: current status and future needs

2024· article· en· W4398200536 on OpenAlexafffund
Sherry L. Grace, Emil Hagström, Alexander Harrison, Samara Phillips, Ann Bovin, Miho Yokoyama, Josef Niebauer, Shigeru Makita, Fabbiha Raidah, Maria Bäck

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteYork UniversityUniversity Health Network
FundersNiilo Helanderin SäätiöQatar UniversityHjärt-LungfondenBritish Heart FoundationYork UniversityJapanese Association of Cardiac RehabilitationNHS Health ScotlandAssociation for Prevention Teaching and ResearchInstitute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of TokyoSveriges Kommuner och LandstingQueensland GovernmentQueensland Health
KeywordsMedicineGlobeCurrent (fluid)RehabilitationPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Correction in: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, zwae397 DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae397

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.852
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Preventive CardiologySame topicCardiac Health and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207