ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-ENHANCED ANALYSIS OF RETINAL VASCULATURE IN AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate associations between quantitative vascular measurements derived from intravenous fluorescein angiography (IVFA) and baseline characteristics on optical coherence tomography (OCT) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients. METHODS: The authors prospectively recruited patients with active choroidal neovascularization secondary to AMD over 50 years old, presenting to a single center in Toronto, Canada from 2017 to 2023. Ultra-widefield IVFA images were processed using the artificial intelligence RETICAD FAassist system to extract quantitative information on blood flow, perfusion, and blood-retinal-barrier (BRB) permeability. Associations between IVFA parameters with functional and anatomical outcomes were examined using univariable and multivariable regression models. RESULTS: Eighty-one nAMD eyes and seven healthy control eyes were included. Compared with healthy controls, BRB permeability in the central and peripheral retina was significantly higher in nAMD patients (P < 0.001). On univariable analysis, BRB permeability measured centrally was significantly associated with central macular thickness (P = 0.035), whereas perfusion and blood flow measured centrally were significantly associated with macular volume (P = 0.043 and 0.037, respectively). On multivariable analysis, BRB permeability remained significantly associated with central macular thickness (P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Central BRB permeability measured on IVFA was significantly associated with baseline central macular thickness in nAMD patients. Future work should longitudinally explore associations between IVFA parameters and clinical characteristics in diverse nAMD populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".