MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398221425 · doi:10.4085/1062-6050-0696.23

Symptom Exacerbation and Adverse Events During a Randomized Trial of Early-Stage Rehabilitation After Sport-Related Concussion: Safety Outcomes From the Active Rehab Study

2024· article· en· W4398221425 on OpenAlexaffabout
Johna K. Register‐Mihalik, Kevin M. Guskiewicz, Karen McCulloch, Jason P. Mihalik, Martin Mrázik, Ian Murphy, Dhiren Naidu, Shabbar I. Ranapurwala, Kathryn Schneider, Paula Gildner, Danielle Salmon, Brandon Auton, Thomas G. Bowman, Eric E. Hall, Loriann M. Hynes, Elizabeth Jewell, Caroline J. Ketcham, Caroline Wesley Siler, S. John Sullivan, Vasiliki Kostogiannes, Michael McCrea

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Athletic Training · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
FundersCenters for Disease Control and PreventionNational Institute of Mental HealthInjury Prevention Research CenterUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Defense
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyRandomized controlled trialExacerbationRehabilitationInterquartile rangePsychological interventionContext (archaeology)Adverse effectInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CONTEXT: Authors of few studies have used randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to quantify clinical intervention safety of rehabilitation after sport-related concussion across sport levels. OBJECTIVE: Describe symptom exacerbation and adverse events (AEs) associated with two concussion rehabilitation interventions. DESIGN: Cluster RCT (NCT02988596). SETTING: Sports medicine clinic and field settings. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: The RCT enrolled 251 concussed athletes (median age = 20 years; female, n = 48) across 28 sites from New Zealand professional rugby (n = 31), Canadian professional football (n = 52), US/Canadian colleges (n = 128) and US high schools (n = 40). INTERVENTIONS: Two medically supervised interventions: (1) enhanced graded exertion (EGE): international return-to-sport strategy and sport-specific activities only (EGE only, n = 119); and (2) multidimensional rehabilitation (MDR) followed by EGE: early symptom-directed exercises once symptoms were stable, followed by EGE after symptoms resolved (MDR + EGE, n = 132). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcomes were intrasession total symptom severity score exacerbation and significant intersession (increase 10+ severity points) sustained total symptom severity exacerbation, each measured with the Postconcussion Symptom Scale (132 total severity points on scale). Reported AEs were also described. Activity-based rehabilitation sessions (n = 1437) were the primary analysis unit. Frequencies, proportions, medians, and interquartile ranges were calculated for outcomes by treatment group. RESULTS: The 251 postinjury participants completed 1437 (MDR + EGE = 819, EGE only = 618) activity-based intervention sessions. A total of 110 and 105 participants contributed data (those missing had no documented session data) to at least 1 activity-based session in the MDR + EGE and EGE-only arms, respectively. Intrasession symptom exacerbations were equivalently low in MDR + EGE and EGE-only arms (MDR + EGE: 16.7%, 95% CI = 14.1%, 19.1%; EGE only: 15.7%, 95% CI = 12.8%, 18.6%). In total, 9/819 MDR + EGE sessions (0.9%) and 1/618 EGE-only sessions (0.2%) resulted in a presession to postsession symptom exacerbation beyond a 10+ severity point increase; 8/9 resolved to <10 points by the next session. Two study-related AEs (1 in each arm) were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Participants in MDR + EGE and EGE-only activities reported equivalently low rates of symptom exacerbation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.531
Threshold uncertainty score0.415

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Athletic TrainingSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207