MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398222698 · doi:10.1002/elsa.202300030

Investigating the kinetics of small alcohol oxidation reactions using platinum supported on a doped niobium suboxide support

2024· article· en· W4398222698 on OpenAlexafffund
Keenan Black‐Araujo, Katherine Nguyen, Reza Alipour Moghadam Esfahani, E. Bradley Easton

Bibliographic record

VenueElectrochemical Science Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCatalytic Processes in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Ontario Institute of Technology
KeywordsSuboxideNiobiumPlatinumKineticsDopingMaterials scienceChemistryMetallurgyOxideCatalysisOrganic chemistryOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Platinum nanoparticles deposited on a silicon‐doped niobium suboxide support provided the catalyst known as Pt/NbOS. This was compared to the commercial Pt/C electrocatalyst in the ethanol and methanol oxidation reactions for use in direct alcohol fuel cells. Cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy demonstrate that the employment of the metal oxide support provides higher peak oxidation currents and smaller charge transfer resistances during alcohol oxidation. Carbon monoxide (CO) stripping experiments showed enhanced removal of CO by Pt/NbOS compared to Pt/C. Pt/NbOS shows its smallest apparent activation energies of 13.3 and 11.9 J mol ‐1 , for methanol and ethanol oxidation respectively, which are 38% and 27% lower than those of Pt/C at the same potentials. This increased activity of Pt/NbOS is attributed to the strong metal‐support interactions between the active Pt nanoparticles and the NbOS support which demonstrate its utility in replacing Pt/C in methanol and ethanol fuel cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.734

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectrochemical Science AdvancesSame topicCatalytic Processes in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207