MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398231446 · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2024.114210

Characterizing satellite-derived freeze/thaw regimes through spatial and temporal clustering for the identification of growing season constraints on vegetation productivity

2024· article· en· W4398231446 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Ramon Melser, Nicholas C. Coops, Chris Derksen

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing of Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsRemote sensingVegetation (pathology)SatelliteProductivityEnvironmental scienceGrowing seasonIdentification (biology)Cluster analysisSatellite imageryComputer scienceAgronomyGeographyEcologyMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vegetation growth and productivity in Canada's boreal are governed by a characteristically short growing season, which is largely driven by the Freeze/Thaw(F/T) cycles that constrain the supply of water and nutrients through seasonally frozen soils. Since much of the vegetation in the Canadian boreal consists of evergreen species which do not experience large seasonal cycles in photosynthetic biomass, monitoring this growing season through the use of visible and near-infrared wavelengths via spectral indices such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) has proven difficult. To adequately capture growing season constraints in these northern environments, microwave remote sensing offers potential. L-band passive microwave observations are sensitive to near-surface soil moisture conditions and can monitor F/T states effectively due to the high contrast in permittivity between frozen and thawed soils. We characterize F/T information using products from both the Soil Moisture Ocean Salinity (SMOS) and Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) missions. Daily F/T retrievals are classified into distinct growing season phases based on a 7-day moving window approach and are used to generate a suite of 12 temporal metrics over the 2017–2019 period including growing season length, timing of the fall freeze transition, ephemeral F/T events, and the total number of state transitions. Several key metrics are also generated from in-situ soil temperature datasets for comparison with the SMOS and SMAP datasets. Uncorrelated F/T metrics were then leveraged to delineate unique regions of F/T-derived growing season characteristics using a K-means clustering approach. Regions derived from SMOS and SMAP F/T retrievals were assessed for their ability to capture unique spatial constraints on vegetation productivity with reference to modelled Gross Primary Productivity (GPP) obtained from SMAP and a MODIS/Fluxnet synergy product. Our results indicate that both SMOS and SMAP-derived F/T metrics correspond with unique spatial patterns in vegetation productivity, illustrating the F/T cycle constraints on the seasonal availability of soil moisture, nutrients and suitable soil temperatures required for vegetation productivity across the Canadian boreal. In addition, the relationship between the SMAP and SMOS F/T-derived growing season length metrics and reference GPP yielded rates of change at 5.30 and 5.64 gC m−2 yr−1 per 1-day increase in growing season length. These estimated rates of change are similar to those identified by studies using complex process-based ecosystem models and in-situ eddy covariance data from flux towers. These similarities highlight the potential of this simple and robust remotely sensed approach for capturing climatic drivers of land cover and vegetation productivity not currently represented in common Canadian ecological regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote Sensing of EnvironmentSame topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207