Topical 5-Fluorouracil 0.5% as primary treatment for Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of topical treatment with 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 0.5% in cases of Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia (OSSN), and to assess the tolerance of patients undergoing treatment. METHODS: Patients with clinical diagnosis of OSSN referred to the Ocular Oncology division from the Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil, were recruited for the current study. Patients were treated with topical 5-FU 0.5% using a regimen of 4 times daily for 10 days, followed by a 3-week drug holiday, continued up to 3 cycles before an alternative treatment. Lesions were evaluated at baseline and throughout treatment. Treatment adherence was assessed using the Morisky Medication Adherence scale. Any adverse events along the treatment were noted. RESULTS: A total of 30 eyes of 30 patients adherent to the treatment were included in the study. Among the total cases treated with 5-FU 0.5%, 24 patients achieved therapeutic success after a mean treatment duration of 21.71 ± 7.77 days, representing a success rate of 80.00% (95% CI: 60.75-91.18%). For each 1 mm2 increase in the lesion area, the odds of treatment success decrease by 6% (OR: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.88-0.99; p = 0.033). Only mild adverse events such as ocular discomfort, ocular burning and tearing were observed along the treatment in 8 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Topical 5-FU 0.5% is an effective therapeutic option in the treatment of OSSN, with an 80% therapeutic success rate, showing good tolerability. The size of the lesion was identified as a factor influencing treatment success, therefore it should be taken into consideration when defining treatment approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it