Metabolites Associated with Polygenic Risk of Breast Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While hundreds of germline genetic variants have been associated with breast cancer risk, the mechanisms underlying the impacts of most of these variants on breast cancer remain uncertain. Metabolomics may offer valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying genetic risks of breast cancer. Among 143 cancer-free female participants, we used linear regression analyses to explore associations between the genetic risk of breast cancer, as determined by a previously developed polygenic risk score (PRS) that included 266 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and 223 measures of metabolites obtained from blood samples using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). A false discovery rate of 10% was applied to account for multiple comparisons. PRS was statistically significantly associated with 45 metabolite measures. These were primarily measures of very low-density lipoproteins (VLDLs) and high-density lipoproteins (HDLs), including triglycerides, cholesterol, and phospholipids. For example, the strongest effect was observed with the percent ratio of medium VLDL triglycerides to total lipids (0.53 unit increase in mean-standardized ln-transformed percent ratio per unit increase in PRS; q = 0.1). While larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these results, this exploratory study presents biologically plausible findings that are consistent with previously reported associations between lipids and breast cancer risk. If confirmed, these lipids could be targeted for lifestyle and pharmaceutical interventions among women at increased genetic risk of breast cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".