MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398245838 · doi:10.1086/728409

The collideroscopic sensorium

2023· article· en· W4398245838 on OpenAlex
David Howes

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHau Journal of Ethnographic Theory · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAesthetic Perception and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAudiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The French navigator, biologist and documentarist Jacques-Yves Cousteau published in 1953 the book Le monde du silence (The silent world, coauthored by Frédéric Dumas). The film of the same name, codirected by Cousteau and Louis Malle, was released in 1956. Although hydrophones were invented some 100 years ago, it seems that Cousteau never used them. Meanwhile, advances in acoustic research have made it possible to revisit the supposedly silent world of oceans as proposed by Cousteau in his film and as imagined by many of us. Even if we do not perceive them, we now know that these aquatic worlds are full of sounds. Yet, the human ear is not adequately equipped to perceive them. This paper reflects on the production of a new cinematographic research-creation project led by underwater sound recordings in various locations, and on multiple sessions of listening. It will discuss how listening to the sounds of the ocean can build new forms of relationships with the aquatic worlds, a relation that is not easily accessible to humans without the mediation of technologies. It will further explore the ways in which sounds and images are experienced underwater, creating new forms of knowledge and awareness of the changing conditions of the ocean.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.669
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it