Bibliographic record
Abstract
The French navigator, biologist and documentarist Jacques-Yves Cousteau published in 1953 the book Le monde du silence (The silent world, coauthored by Frédéric Dumas). The film of the same name, codirected by Cousteau and Louis Malle, was released in 1956. Although hydrophones were invented some 100 years ago, it seems that Cousteau never used them. Meanwhile, advances in acoustic research have made it possible to revisit the supposedly silent world of oceans as proposed by Cousteau in his film and as imagined by many of us. Even if we do not perceive them, we now know that these aquatic worlds are full of sounds. Yet, the human ear is not adequately equipped to perceive them. This paper reflects on the production of a new cinematographic research-creation project led by underwater sound recordings in various locations, and on multiple sessions of listening. It will discuss how listening to the sounds of the ocean can build new forms of relationships with the aquatic worlds, a relation that is not easily accessible to humans without the mediation of technologies. It will further explore the ways in which sounds and images are experienced underwater, creating new forms of knowledge and awareness of the changing conditions of the ocean.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.043 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".