MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398256122 · doi:10.1201/9781003303237-16

Analysis of Climate Variability and Change Impact on Rainfall Trend Pattern in Nigeria

2024· book-chapter· en· W4398256122 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abali Temple Probyne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimatologyClimate changeEnvironmental scienceGeographyPhysical geographyGeologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The climate variability and change impact on rainfall trend pattern in Nigeria in general and Calabar river basin in particular were analyzed in the present study. It involved analysis of climatic data documentation of the Nigerian Meteorological Agency (NIMET), Calabar Station that span 43 years (1971–2014) of the study area and compared against NIMET’s historical meteorological maps of Nigeria between 1941–1970 and 1971–2000, otherwise called the base period to ascertain the status of climate variability and change. The comparison revealed a historical sequential rise in temperature, evidenced by late onset and early cessation of the rains. The late onset and early cessation of rains have necessitated the contraction of the length of the rainy season. This has impacted negatively on farming practices in the region. Furthermore, there is also evidence of significant changes in known weather patterns in the region. For example, the little dry season, then commonly known as August Break, has become less significant in the region. Similarly, the analysis has revealed that the environment has become warmer as temperatures have risen considerably and Harmattan dust haze has also become more pronounced in recent years. The evaluation of climate change pattern of Calabar river basin was necessitated owing to its distinct socio-economic benefit to Nigeria. The region plays host to Africa’s foremost leisure resort (Tinapa), one of world’s largest rubber plantations (Pamol), the National Integrated Power Project (NIPP), Nigerian Police Training School, etc. In Nigeria, Cross River State has over 40% of the remaining tropical high forests (THFs) of the entire nation. The forest resource base includes the mangrove swamps and tropical rainforest in the south, the central, and the derived Guinea savanna toward the north. Thus, Cross River has become the most forested State in Nigeria with at least 75% of its population inhabiting rural communities. However, over the last decades, the region has lost about 19% of its tropical high forests due to inadequate funding of the Forestry Department, increase in population and immigration, and plantation establishment. To ameliorate the effects of climate change, the study recommends improved energy efficiency, shift to renewable resources/cleaner source of energy (solar and wind), reduced deforestation and planting of trees. Furthermore, there should be absolute compliance with international organizations’ action plans that fight global warming, i.e., the Montreal Protocol of 1987, the 1979 convention on long-range trans-boundary air pollution, the Kyoto Protocol of 1997, the clean air act (1990), UNCED (1992), USA (2008) congress, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207