Genome-wide association analyses reveal copy number variant regions associated with reproduction and disease traits in Canadian Holstein cattle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of copy number variants (CNV) on 13 reproduction and 12 disease traits in Holstein cattle. Intensity signal files containing log R ratio and B allele frequency information from 13,730 Holstein animals genotyped with a 95K SNP panel, and 8,467 Holstein animals genotyped with a 50K SNP panel were used to identify the CNVs. Subsequently, the identified CNVs were validated using whole-genome sequence data from 126 animals, resulting in 870 high-confidence copy number variant regions (CNVR) on 12,131 animals. Out of these, 54 CNVR had frequencies higher than or equal to 1% in the population and were used in the genome-wide association analysis (one CNVR at a time, including the G matrix). Results revealed that 4 CNVR were significantly associated with at least one of the traits analyzed in this study. Specifically, 2 CNVR were associated with 3 reproduction traits (i.e., calf survival, first service to conception, and nonreturn rate), and 2 CNVR were associated with 2 disease traits (i.e., metritis and retained placenta). These CNVR harbored genes implicated in immune response, cellular signaling, and neuronal development, supporting their potential involvement in these traits. Further investigations to unravel the mechanistic and functional implications of these CNVR on the mentioned traits are warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".