Review: <i>Transatlantic Cinephilia: Film Culture between Latin America and France, 1945–1965</i>, by Rielle Navitski
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Book Review| June 01 2024 Review: Transatlantic Cinephilia: Film Culture between Latin America and France, 1945–1965, by Rielle Navitski Transatlantic Cinephilia: Film Culture between Latin America and France, 1945–1965, by Rielle Navitski Irene Rozsa Irene Rozsa IRENE ROZSA works on film and visual culture in Latin America. Her scholarship has been published in Studies in Spanish and Latin American Cinemas, Canadian Journal of Film Studies, Modernism/Modernity Print Plus, and the edited anthology Cosmopolitan Film Cultures in Latin America, 1896–1960. She teaches at Concordia University. Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar BOOK DATA: Rielle Navitski, Transatlantic Cinephilia: Film Culture between Latin America and France, 1945–1965. Oakland: University of California Press. $29.95 paper; $29.95 e-book. 336 pages. Film Quarterly (2024) 77 (4): 93–95. https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2024.77.4.93 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Irene Rozsa; Review: Transatlantic Cinephilia: Film Culture between Latin America and France, 1945–1965, by Rielle Navitski. Film Quarterly 1 June 2024; 77 (4): 93–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.2024.77.4.93 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentFilm Quarterly Search BOOK DATA: Rielle Navitski, Transatlantic Cinephilia: Film Culture between Latin America and France, 1945–1965. Oakland: University of California Press. $29.95 paper; $29.95 e-book. 336 pages. Rielle Navitski's new book, Transatlantic Cinephilia: Film Culture between Latin America and France, 1945–1965, breathes life into the footnotes of Latin American film history. In times of extreme political polarization, this work highlights the importance of accepting contradiction and striving for a nuanced interpretation of the past. Examining cinephile activity across many different countries, the book looks beyond reductive Cold War narratives of Hollywood cultural colonization and Latin American nationalist and pancontinental left-wing ideals to integrate France's cultural diplomacy as a pivotal point of reference. The author argues that to fully understand Latin American film culture during the postwar period, it is crucial to consider the mutually beneficial relationship developed between the middle-class consumers of French cinematic culture and the institutional and commercial... You do not currently have access to this content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".