GCMS-ID: a webserver for identifying compounds from gas chromatography mass spectrometry experiments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
GCMS-ID (Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry compound IDentifier) is a webserver designed to enable the identification of compounds from GC-MS experiments. GC-MS instruments produce both electron impact mass spectra (EI-MS) and retention index (RI) data for as few as one, to as many as hundreds of different compounds. Matching the measured EI-MS, RI or EI-MS + RI data to experimentally collected EI-MS and/or RI reference libraries allows facile compound identification. However, the number of available experimental RI and EI-MS reference spectra, especially for metabolomics or exposomics-related studies, is disappointingly small. Using machine learning to accurately predict the EI-MS spectra and/or RIs for millions of metabolomics and/or exposomics-relevant compounds could (partially) solve this spectral matching problem. This computational approach to compound identification is called in silico metabolomics. GCMS-ID brings this concept of in silico metabolomics closer to reality by intelligently integrating two of our previously published webservers: CFM-EI and RIpred. CFM-EI is an EI-MS spectral prediction webserver, and RIpred is a Kovats RI prediction webserver. We have found that GCMS-ID can accurately identify compounds from experimental RI, EI-MS or RI + EI-MS data through matching to its own large library of >1 million predicted RI/EI-MS values generated for metabolomics/exposomics-relevant compounds. GCMS-ID can also predict the RI or EI-MS spectrum from a user-submitted structure or annotate a user-submitted EI-MS spectrum. GCMS-ID is freely available at https://gcms-id.ca/.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.058 | 0.052 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".