MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398770115 · doi:10.29173/mlj922

Bill 2: The Highway Traffic Amendment Act (Safety of Workers in Highway Construction Zones)

2015· article· en· W4398770115 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andreq Hnatiuk

Bibliographic record

VenueManitoba Law Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmendmentTransport engineeringHighway engineeringEngineeringForensic engineeringLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bill 2 was introduced into the Manitoba Legislature.It amends The Highway Traffic Act 1 in four ways: First, this Bill defines a "designated construction zone" and allows the Traffic Authority to (a) mark a "designated construction zone" and (b) give permission to another person, usually the contractor, to place the necessary signage.Second, this Bill removes the "when passing workers" provision from speed limits in designated construction zones.Third, it makes the fine for speeding in a designated construction zone double the fine for speeding elsewhere by increasing the additional fine per kilometre per hour in excess of the speed limit from $5.00 to $7.70.Finally, this Bill permits regulations to be made relating to safety measures, signage requirements, broadening of the definition of "designated construction zone,"

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManitoba Law JournalSame topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207