Making the diamond vortex phase masks for the METIS instrument
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Direct observation of exoplanets and proto-planetary disks with the METIS instrument at the Extremely Large Telescope will provide new insights into the processes of planet formation and exoplanet atmospheres. This will be possible thanks to a powerful vector vortex coronagraph that can suppress the starlight to reveal faint signals around it. Here we present the process of making the phase masks at the heart of the coronagraph. These annular groove phase masks consist of deep sub-wavelength gratings in diamond that are etched using inductively coupled oxygen plasma with a strong bias. The METIS instrument requires a wider bandwidth than such components have previously been demonstrated for, leading to a grating design with higher aspect ratio and more vertical walls. To achieve this, the etch mask used for diamond etching was changed from aluminium to silicon and the plasma power was increased. We also improved on our method for reducing the grating depth of finished components to fine-tune them. Together with improved optical testing, this allowed us to produce the best vortex phase masks so far demonstrated for the astronomical N-band.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".