P.153 Utility of neurophysiology in the diagnosis of tethered cord syndrome (TCS)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Tethered cord syndrome, a condition in which the spinal cord stretches as a child grows, can cause various clinical symptoms. Occult TCS (OTCS) is a condition where a child displays some or many clinical symptoms of TCS, but no radiographic abnormality confirms the presence of a tethered cord (1-4). Diagnosis of OTCS in children is invasive and multi-factorial. The current diagnostic approach involves three main factors- clinical signs and symptoms, radiographic evidence, and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) tested under general anesthesia. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive testing method for OTCS. It can replace MEPs, which are conducted under general anesthesia. Methods: We will conduct a case-control series of children at our center who have undergone TMS. We will characterize the children who have TCS and suspected OTCS and detail the children’s current diagnosis methods and outcomes in a technical note. We will then compare their pre-operative and post-operative data. Results: So far, we have conducted TMS on 10 children to help diagnose occult TCS. Conclusions: This approach is a novel and effective way to improve the accuracy of diagnosis in children, potentially preventing unnecessary surgery, or detecting patients who would otherwise suffer from the condition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".