MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4398817251 · doi:10.7910/dvn/vy4tje

Terms and Concepts found in Tenure and Promotion Guidelines from the US and Canada

2018· dataset· en· W4398817251 on OpenAlexaffabout
Juan Pablo Alperín, Carol Muñoz Nieves, Lesley A. Schimanski, Erin C. McKiernan, Meredith T. Niles

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2018
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAcademic Publishing and Open Access
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersOpen Society Foundations
KeywordsPromotion (chess)Political scienceRegional scienceGeographyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Terms and concepts related to open access, public engagement, research metrics and publication types found in review, tenure, and promotion guidelines from 129 universities from the United States and Canada. Python code (Jupyter notebook) for computing aggregations is available on Github. Other publications from this project are forthcoming. Sign up for the ScholCommLab's mailing list to stay up to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.059
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score0.911

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.059
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0310.081
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0050.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2460.185

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHarvard DataverseSame topicAcademic Publishing and Open AccessFrench-language works237,207