MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399007214 · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2024.106708

Non-identical parallel machines batch processing problem to minimize the makespan: Models and algorithms

2024· article· en· W4399007214 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers & Operations Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilLoughborough UniversityUniversity of NottinghamUniversity of Bath
KeywordsJob shop schedulingMetaheuristicComputer scienceMathematical optimizationScheduling (production processes)AlgorithmVariable neighborhood searchTime complexityComputational complexity theoryFlow shop schedulingBatch processingMathematicsRouting (electronic design automation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies a parallel heterogeneous machine batching and scheduling problem in which weighted jobs are first batched, and the batches are then assigned and sequenced on machines of varying capacities. The duration of a batch is the longest time needed to process a job, and the objective is that of minimizing the makespan, or the sum of the batches durations on the machine finishing last. The authors develop polynomial-size mathematical formulations and a variable neighborhood search metaheuristic. Extensive computational results suggest that the flow-based formulation outperforms a compact formulation, despite its larger number of variables. The metaheuristic is capable of producing high-quality solutions within a limited computing time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it