Effect of Avenciguat on Albuminuria in Patients with CKD
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key Points Despite new treatments for CKD, kidney failure risk remains high, particularly where albuminuria remains. We report a prespecified pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials assessing a soluble guanylate cyclase activator for CKD. Avenciguat led to improvements in albuminuria in patients with CKD with/without type 2 diabetes mellitus, with acceptable safety. Background Avenciguat is a novel, potent soluble guanylate cyclase activator in development for CKD. Two trials investigated avenciguat in diabetic (NCT04750577) and non-diabetic (NCT04736628) CKD. Methods A prespecified pooled analysis of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of identical design. Adults with CKD (eGFR ≥20 and <90 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , urine albumin–creatinine ratio [UACR] ≥200 and <3500 mg/g) were randomized to 20 weeks of placebo or avenciguat 1, 2, or 3 mg three times daily (TID), adjunctive to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. The primary end point was change from baseline in UACR in 10-hour urine at week 20, analyzed per protocol. The secondary end point was UACR change from baseline in first morning void urine at week 20. Safety was monitored throughout. Results Overall, 500 patients (mean age 62 years [SD 13]; mean eGFR 44 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 [SD 18] and median 10-hour UACR 719 [interquartile range, 379–1285] mg/g) received placebo ( n =122) or avenciguat 1 mg ( n =125), 2 mg ( n =126), or 3 mg ( n =127) TID. All 243 patients in study one and 27 of 261 patients in study two had diabetes mellitus. Avenciguat 1, 2, and 3 mg TID reduced UACR in 10-hour and first morning void urine versus placebo throughout the treatment period. At week 20, placebo-corrected geometric mean changes (95% confidence interval) from baseline in UACR in 10-hour urine with avenciguat 1, 2, and 3 mg TID were −15.5% (−26.4 to −3.0), −13.2% (−24.6 to −0.1), and −21.5% (−31.7 to −9.8), respectively, analyzed per protocol. Corresponding changes in first morning void urine were −19.4% (−30.0 to −7.3), −15.5% (−26.9 to −2.5), and −23.4% (−33.5 to −11.8), respectively. Avenciguat was well tolerated; the overall frequency of adverse events was low and similar to placebo. The number of patients who discontinued the study drug because of adverse events with avenciguat 1, 2, and 3 mg TID were five (4%), 11 (9%), and 11 (9%), respectively, compared with four (3%) in the placebo group. Conclusions Avenciguat lowered albuminuria and was well tolerated in patients with CKD. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: A Study to Test the Effect of Different Doses of BI 685509 on Kidney Function in People With Diabetic Kidney Disease, NCT04750577, and A Study to Test the Effect of Different Doses of Avenciguat (BI 685509) on Kidney Function in People With Chronic Kidney Disease, NCT04736628. Podcast This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2024_06_27_ASN0000000000000418.mp3
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".