Incorporating Sodium‐Conductive Polymeric Interfacial Adhesive with Inorganic Solid‐State Electrolytes for Quasi‐Solid‐State Sodium Metal Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Inorganic solid‐state electrolytes have attracted enormous attention due to their potential safety, increased energy density, and long cycle‐life benefits. However, their application in solid‐state batteries is limited by unstable electrode‐electrolyte interface, poor point‐to‐point physical contact, and low utilization of metallic anodes. Herein, interfacial engineering based on sodium (Na)‐conductive polymeric solid‐state interfacial adhesive is studied to improve interface stability and optimize physical contacts, constructing a robust organic‐rich solid electrolyte interphase layer to prevent dendrite‐induced crack propagation and security issues. The interfacial adhesive strategy significantly increases the room‐temperature critical current density of inorganic Na‐ion conductors from 0.8 to 3.2 mA cm −2 and markedly enhances the cycling performance of solid‐state batteries up to 500 cycles, respectively. Particularly, the Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 ‐based full solid‐state batteries with high cathode loading of 10.16 mg cm −2 also deliver an excellent cycling performance, further realizing the stable operation of solid‐state laminated pouch cells. The research provides fundamental perspectives into the role of interfacial chemistry and takes the field a step closer to realizing practical solid‐state batteries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".