Inhibiting Dendrites by Uniformizing Microstructure of Superionic Lithium Argyrodites for All‐Solid‐State Lithium Metal Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The all‐solid‐state lithium metal battery is considered the next‐generation energy storage device with the potential to double the energy density of state‐of‐the‐art Li‐ion batteries and eliminate safety hazards. Achieving stable Li plating/stripping without dendrite propagation within the solid electrolyte is crucial for delivering the promised high energy density. In this study, through the comparison of various synthesis routes, a novel cube‐shaped microstructure in the Li 5.3 PS 4.3 ClBr 0.7 argyrodite electrolyte, synthesized using the high‐speed mechanical milling followed by annealing method (BMAN‐LPSCB) is identified. The uniform microstructure allows for the production of an electrolyte pellet with significantly reduced porosity through cold pressing. The removal of defects has significantly enhanced the electrolyte's ability to inhibit dendrite formation, with a critical current density reaching 3.8 mA cm −2 . The lithium symmetric cell with BMAN‐LPSCB electrolyte exhibits stable Li plating/stripping for over 150 h at a high current density and cutoff capacity of 3 mA cm −2 / 3 mAh cm −2 . The all‐solid‐state Li/NCM battery utilizing the BMAN‐LPSCB electrolyte also demonstrates excellent durability, with a capacity retention of 96% over 1000 cycles at a 1C rate. This study emphasizes that the microstructure of the sulfide electrolyte is a critical factor influencing mechanically‐driven Li dendrite propagation in all‐solid‐state batteries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".