An Empirical Study of the Use of Educational Techniques to Change Preschool Educators' Attitudes Toward Their Profession
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Professional attitudes are one of the most important aspects that determine the level of success in one's work with preschool instructors as well as the quality of the professional activities that are performed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of psychological approaches in influencing the attitudes of preschool teachers in order to favorably modify the participants' emotions and professional behaviors, which would ultimately result in participants having a more positive attitude toward their work. We recruited 70 preschool teachers from among the 347 participants who made up the entire sample. There were 36 teachers assigned to the experimental group, and 34 teachers assigned to the control group. The research utilizes psychological methods to influence the participants' perspectives on the nature of their work. After participating in the trial, the individuals' levels went from 1 and 2 to 4, according to the findings, which indicates that this change occurred immediately. The theory of teachers' professional attitudes and the actuality of the attitudes held by preschool teachers are discussed in relation to these findings. In addition, the administrator and educators are responsible for guiding the creation of the police document so that it satisfies the requirements of innovation, education, human resource development, current requirements, requirements of enterprises, employers, and employers, as well as satisfying the criteria for general education innovation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".