Tandem mass spectrometry of homologous 3‐hydroxyfurazan and nitrile amino acids: Analysis of cooperative interactions and fragmentation processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The assignment of structure by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) relies on the interpretation of the fragmentation behavior of gas‐phase ions. Mass spectra were acquired for a series of heterocyclic mimetics of acidic amino acids and a related series of nitrile amino acids. All amino acids were readily protonated or deprotonated by electrospray ionization (ESI), and distinctive fragmentation processes were observed when the ions were subjected to collision‐induced dissociation (CID). The deprotonated heterocycles showed bond cleavages of the 3‐hydroxyfurazan ring with formation of oxoisocyanate and the complementary deprotonated nitrile amino acid. Further fragmentation of the deprotonated nitrile amino acids was greatly dependent on the length of the alkyl nitrile side chain. Competing losses of CO 2 versus HCN occurred from α‐cyanoglycinate (shortest chain), whereas water was lost from 2‐amino‐5‐cyanopentanoate (longest chain). Interestingly, loss of acrylonitrile by a McLafferty‐type fragmentation process was detected for 2‐amino‐4‐cyanobutanoate, and several competing processes were observed for β‐cyanoalanate. In one process, cyanide ion was formed either by consecutive losses of ammonia, carbon dioxide, and acetylene or by a one‐step decarboxylative elimination. In another, complementary ions were obtained from β‐cyanoalanate by loss of acetonitrile or HN=CHCO 2 H. Fragmentation of the protonated 3‐hydroxyfurazan and nitrile amino acids resulted in the cumulative loss (H 2 O + CO), a loss that is commonly observed for protonated aliphatic α‐amino acids. Overall, the distinct fragmentation behavior of the multifunctional 3‐hydroxyfurazan amino acids correlated with the charged site, whereas fragmentations of the deprotonated nitrile amino acids showed cooperative interactions between the nitrile and the carboxylate groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".