MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399024804 · doi:10.14740/jnr765

Motor Neuron Disease-Frontotemporal Dementia Spectrum Disorder: A Different Phenotype Related With a Novel <i>TBK1</i> Gene Variant

2024· article· en· W4399024804 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joana Ferreira Pinto, Mariana Santos, Rita Silva, Diana Matos, Vera Fernandes, Ana Filipa Santos

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological diseases and metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontotemporal dementiaMedicinePhenotypeMotor neuronGeneDiseaseNeuroscienceDementiaTANK-binding kinase 1Clinical phenotypeGeneticsPathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The association of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and motor neuron disease (MND) is a clinical continuum with genetic and neuropathological overlap. Cohort analysis has been broadening our phenotypic and genotypic knowledge on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders. A 57-year-old woman presented with a progressive speech disturbance followed by the development of progressive upper MND in the next 2 years. Rapid progression of disease included anarthria, severe dysphagia requiring a gastrostomy tube and a tetrapyramidal syndrome without lower motor neuron signs. Death occurred within 4 years. Complementary investigation showed a left mesial temporal and frontal lobe atrophy, as well as a corticospinal tract hyperintensity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Hypometabolism in the left parietal-temporal and frontal lobes was also evident in FDG-PET. The association of progressive apraxia of speech with upper motor neuron signs in our patient prompted genetic testing and the finding of a novel TBK1 gene variant. Genetic testing should be considered in patients presenting with FTD, particularly with a positive family history or secondarily associated with an MND. Population-based studies are needed to clarify the prevalence and clinical phenotypes of TBK1 variant carriers. J Neurol Res. 2024;14(1):43-47 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jnr765

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology ResearchSame topicNeurological diseases and metabolismFrench-language works237,207