Effects of Manual Therapy in Management of Diastasis Recti - A Case Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Background: The patient was a 32 years old postpartum female with complaint of back pain which was radiating to abdominal area, she was functional limitations and abdominal muscle weakness. Methods and Measures: patient was treated 8 sessions over a period of 4 weeks. Study: Case study Intervention: Intervention included KT for rectus abdominis muscle and PF strengthening exercises to stabilize and strengthen the weakened muscles and to reduce IRD. Results: Following treatment, the patient demonstrated in an increase in functional ability and resolution of functional limitations. Statistical analysis of the data showed significant differences from pre to post intervention from session 1 to session 8. There was clinical and statistical significance found in PFS and IRD. Conclusion: Findings suggest that KT and PF strengthening exercises are more effective in reducing IRD and improving function in patient with Diastasis Recti Key words: Inter-Recti Distance(IRD), Rectus Abdominis (RA), Rectus Diastasis (RD), Diastasis Recti Abdominis(DRA), Ultrasound (Usd), Kinesio taping (KT), Physical Function Scale (PFS),Pelvic Floor (PF), Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE), Linea Alba (LA).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it