Bill 40, the Condominium Act and Amendments respecting Condominium Conversions Reviews: 5th Session, 39th Legislature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Substantial amendments were also made to The Residential Tenancies Act, The City of Winnipeg Charter, and The Municipal Act by Bill-40.The crux of these other amendments were the adoption of an opt-in scheme that would allow municipalities and the city of Winnipeg to adopt a scheme of regulations that would require projects for the conversion of rental properties into condominiums to obtain municipal approval.I have not addressed this aspect of Bill-40, except in passing.It is unclear at this point if any municipalities are going to exercise this new power.Bill 40, The Condominium Act and Amendments Respecting Condominium Conversions (Various Acts Amended), 5 th Sess.39 th Leg, Manitoba, 2011 (assented to 16 June, 2011), CCSM 2011, c 170 [Act].Will also be referred to as "Bill-40", "the Act", "the new Act". 2 The Condominium Act, CCSM 1985, C170 [Old Act]. 3 Manitoba, Manitoba Family Services and Consumer Affairs, Discussion Paper: Proposed New Condominium Act (2010) at 8 online: Government of Manitoba Digital O
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.012 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.034 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".